Skip to content

Bridge Atlas - Episode 2: Paradigms | Nils Gilman and Josh Stark

Interview Nils Gilman, Josh Stark
researcher practitioner
Open resource →

Nils Gilman (Berggruen Institute) and Josh Stark (Ethereum Foundation) discuss two concepts they each coined: 'planetary thinking' (governance of non-human-directed flows like carbon, whales, and space debris) and 'hardness' (a system's capacity to make future outcomes reliably true, distinct from subjective trust or reliance). They explore how hardness explains Ethereum's appeal amid declining institutional trust, distinguish hardness from trust using examples like universities versus Harvard's reputation, and discuss Ethereum's potential role in planetary-scale coordination through projects like Rarimo's Freedom Tool and Bhutan's national ID system.

Related resources

Talk

Atoms, Institutions, Blockchains

Josh Stark of the Ethereum Foundation presents his 'hardness' framework, arguing that atoms, institutions, and blockchains are three distinct sources that make future outcomes predictable enough to enable human social coordination, resolving the apparent contradiction between blockchains being 'trustless' (no reliance on institutional hardness) and 'trustworthy' (they possess their own hardness). He introduces the term 'cast' for the specific outcome being hardened, analyzes the comparative strengths and weaknesses of each hardness source, and closes with open questions about whether protocols constitute a fourth category or sit inside/across the other three. The talk is followed by discussion with Trent, Juan, Seth, Gordon, and Dorian probing how to measure, discover, and red-team hardness.

atomsinstitutionsblockchains-framework cast guest-talks

Josh Stark

Interview

Bridge Atlas - Episode 4: Alignment | Emmett Shear & Alex Stokes

Emmett Shear (founder of Softmax) argues that alignment is not a fixed state but a relative, multi-scale protocol built on shared success, specialization, and only then enforcement, and warns that a single global, fork-resistant blockchain or AI system would be dangerous because it eliminates the ability to exit or locally reinterpret rules. Alex Stokes (Ethereum Foundation) counters that Ethereum's decentralization and permissionlessness push power to the edges, using rollups and the ability to fork as mechanisms to avoid Shear's feared 'ossified' lock-in, while the two debate whether Ethereum or any man-made protocol can sustain genuine, evolving alignment the way Shear argues organic systems do via Karl Friston's free energy principle.

alignment-as-protocol-shared-success-specialization-enforcement bridge-atlas forking-and-exit-rights

Emmett Shear, Alex Stokes

Interview

Bridge Atlas - Episode 5: Verifiability | Shreya Shankar & Justin Drake

Shreya Shankar (Berkeley PhD, creator of the DocETL declarative data-processing system) and Justin Drake (Ethereum Foundation, lean Ethereum project) compare verifiability across AI data pipelines and blockchain consensus. Drake explains SNARKs, trust-minimization, and recursive proof composition for Ethereum's deterministic and non-deterministic components, while Shankar details how DocETL handles LLM-powered query pipelines, human-AI misalignment, and eval design for unstructured data like court transcripts, with both drawing parallels between 'hints' in SNARK proving and decomposition techniques for AI reasoning verification.

ai-eval-design-and-human-ai-misalignment bridge-atlas docetl-declarative-data-pipelines

Shreya Shankar, Justin Drake

Topics

bridge-atlas globalization-vs-planetary-flows governance hardness institutional-vs-protocol-based-coordination planetary-thinking protocols technology trust-experience