Skip to content

Capital Enclosure for Software Commons

Paper Trent Van Epps

Van Epps argues that entities extracting profits from software commons like Linux and Ethereum have the greatest incentive and capacity to co-opt them, analyzing how common-pool resources operate according to internal logics distinct from capital accumulation. The paper examines the structural tension between the anti-rival nature of digital goods and the enclosure mechanisms through which commercial actors capture value from collaborative software ecosystems.

Related resources

Talk

Salon II: ARC Regenerative Communities - 2024 Protocol Symposium

Kalia Young and Day present research on the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) as a regenerative standards development organization, examining how its protocols and social structures enable long-term innovation and maintenance of the internet as digital public infrastructure. They argue that the IETF's decentralized, generative approach to protocol creation represents a model for pro-social technical communities seeking to build and sustain digital commons.

digital-commons governance internet-engineering-task-force-ietf

Kalia Young, Day

Talk

Nathan Schneider: Contributions to a Glossary of Protocol

Nathan Schneider, professor of media studies at the University of Colorado Boulder, presents his research on protocol studies and shares a glossary project documenting the intellectual history of protocols across disciplines. He traces how the term 'protocol' appears across online economies, blockchains, crypto, and social networks, and discusses his oral history initiative interviewing protocol practitioners worldwide.

governance online-economies oral-history-of-protocols

Nathan Schneider

Talk

Salon IV: Plurality in Practice - 2024 Protocol Symposium

Ben Bush and Rich McDow present their Protocol Orienteering grant project on plural voting mechanisms, which conducted quantitative analysis of plurality-based voting systems through experiments and case studies. They assess the practical risks and rewards of implementing plural voting compared to alternatives, identify issues in standard Conviction Voting (CCM) implementations, and propose guidelines for calibrating these mechanisms to specific governance contexts.

conviction-voting daos-and-web3-governance governance

Ben Bush, Rich McDow