Skip to content

Shoreline Adaptations: Case File

Framework Celeste LeCompte, Danielle Butler

This case file examines protocols for shoreline adaptation in cities facing sea level rise, challenging the engineering-led approach that relies on hardened infrastructure while disconnecting communities from coastlines. The authors propose alternative protocols rooted in activism and adaptive community engagement that enable vibrant, resilient waterfront futures rather than merely protecting existing capital investments.

Related resources

Framework

Fire Protocols: Case File

Fire Protocols reframes fire from a destructive force to be suppressed into an essential ecological tool by developing community-based protocols for fire knowledge transmission and large-scale coordinated action across social, political, and ecological systems in Sonoma County. The framework positions attention as an autopoietic space that allows communities to regenerate and maintain fire knowledge while resolving tensions between geopolitical top-down structures and cultural knowledge systems.

case-study climate community

Nathalia Scherer, Jiordi Rosales

Paper

Protocol Pattern Language for Urban Space: Introduction

This paper applies pattern language methodology to urban protocols, examining how individuals navigate and reshape cities through literal and virtual itineraries while acknowledging different actors (residents, governments, corporations, architects) possess different toolkits to modify urban systems at various layers. Austin argues that contemporary urban environments are composed through individual daily protocols and interactions rather than fixed spatial arrangements, offering a framework for understanding how protocols govern urban life.

community design governance

Drew Austin

Talk

Salon II: ARC Regenerative Communities - 2024 Protocol Symposium

Kaliya Young and 'day' present research into the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) as a case study in regenerative governance, tracing its origins from the 1969 ARPANET through the 1992 governance crisis that shifted power from Vint Cerf's 'kitchen cabinet' IAB to open working groups organized around 'rough consensus and running code.' They map IETF practices—nomcom's randomized leadership selection, open RFC documentation, dispatch meetings, and ritualized in-person gatherings—onto three pattern languages (Group Works, Wise Democracy, and Social Permaculture) to argue that openness, transparency, and voluntariness are structural necessities, not limitations, for sustaining a healthy digital commons.

case-study governance nomcom-random-leadership-selection

Kaliya Young, day