Skip to content

Guest Talk with Daniel Bashir | A Survey of AI for the Protocol-Minded

Talk Daniel Bashir

Daniel Bashir, ML engineer at AWS and host of The Gradient podcast, surveys how protocol thinking applies across AI—from funding and scaling laws (like DeepMind's Chinchilla compute-optimal training protocol) to benchmarks (perplexity vs. François Chollet's ARC benchmark for measuring sample-efficient generalization) to regulation (the EU AI Act's risk-tiered categorization). He argues that nearly every layer of AI development—research, engineering, deployment, and governance—can be reframed as a set of competing or evolving protocols, using examples like Sarah Hooker's 'hardware lottery' and Tolga Bolukbasi-style debates over fair/responsible AI operationalization.

Related resources

Talk

Guest Talk with Cory Levinson | Who Writes the Rules of Climate Protocols?

Cory Levinson traces the history of carbon markets from the Kyoto Protocol through the Paris Agreement's still-unoperationalized Article 6.4, contrasting the fragmented voluntary carbon market (Verra, Gold Standard, ACR) with compliance regimes, and recounts how Toucan's CO2 (CLA) tokenization protocol exploited Verra's retirement mechanism until Verra froze bridging in 2022. He then frames climate protocols into three layers—financial, scientific (MRV/methodologies), and semantic (ontologies/RDF)—arguing that semantic protocols using relational data models like RDF and the semantic web could let disparate scientific methodologies build on each other rather than scaling in isolation.

article-64-compliance-vs-voluntary-carbon-markets carbon-credit-tokenization-retirementimmobilization governance

Cory Levinson

Talk

Attention as Natural Law

Amber Case presents the Calm Technology Institute's 81-point certification framework, arguing that human attention operates like a law of nature—distinguishing prefrontal-cortex-demanding 'center' attention from pass-through 'peripheral' attention—and that products (from car buttons to AI interfaces) should be designed and governed accordingly. She traces the framework's lineage to Mark Weiser's 1995 calm technology principles and discusses the legitimacy problem of building certification authority without statutory power, comparing CTI to Underwriter Laboratories and the Good Housekeeping Seal. The session closes with audience discussion, including Venkatesh Rao connecting the talk to Kairos/Chronos time and AI's 'staircase' temporality.

attention-as-natural-law-center-vs-periphery-mark-weiser calm-technology-certification-framework-81-point-six-categories certification-legitimacy-and-protocol-authority-without-enforcement-power

Amber Case

Talk

Guest Talk with Trent Van Epps | Capital and Enclosure in Software Commons: Linux & Ethereum

Trent Van Epps, researcher at the Ethereum Foundation and steward of Protocol Guild, presents a framework distinguishing capital and commons modes of production, then applies it to case studies of Linux (and Red Hat's gradual enclosure of CentOS) and Ethereum. He argues Ethereum is unique among software commons because it contains embedded capital circuits (proof-of-stake ETH, MEV, liquid staking) and produces a single globally-bound state object, raising the question of whether this containment stabilizes or dooms the commons to capture, and proposes Protocol Guild's unaffiliated funding model as a partial countermeasure.

anti-rival-and-symbiotic-goods commons-vs-capital-modes-of-production embedded-capital-circuits-in-ethereum-l1

Trent Van Epps