Skip to content

Guest Talk with Alex Komoroske | Gardening Platforms

Talk Alex Komoroske

Alex Komoroske, drawing on his experience leading Chrome's web platform team, argues that platforms should be 'gardened' rather than engineered: built incrementally and horizontally from adjacent possible use cases rather than vertically toward a single predetermined goal, with continuous 'rationalization' to pay down the debt that inevitably accumulates as platform and ecosystem co-evolve. He frames platforms and their ecosystems as living, symbiotic systems bound by a 'gravitational pull' that breaks if changes move too fast, and discusses how platforms die through ossification, rising coordination costs, or failed 'second system' rewrites. In Q&A he extends the framework to crypto protocols, corporate digital transformation, and security-by-design, debating with Toby Shorin and others how legal/organizational fragmentation changes platform dynamics in permissionless networks like Ethereum, Cosmos, and Solana.

Related resources

Talk

Guest Talk with JD Nolen | Protocols...The Structural Change that Healthcare Needs But Won't Ask For

JD Nolen, chair of pathology and lab medicine at Children's Mercy Hospital and co-chair of HL7's orders and observations working group, argues that healthcare data exchange—built on legacy standards like HL7v2, CDA, and FHIR—remains brittle and siloed despite decades of standardization efforts. He proposes genomics as the ideal 'green field' testing ground for a protocol-first Layer Two architecture, since it has clear data flows, homebrew infrastructure, and no entrenched incumbents, making it ripe for distributed, protocol-powered repositories like the GenomeX accelerator.

authenticationauthorizationpermission-as-healthcare-protocols fhir-fast-healthcare-interoperability-resources genomex-genomic-repository-accelerator

JD Nolen

Talk

A Common Protocol for Composable, Modular Organizations

Simone Cicero of Boundaryless presents O2A (Open Organisation Alliance), a proposed open standard for making organizations 'composable' by replacing implicit coordination mechanisms like hierarchy and meetings with an explicit, machine-readable contract graph of units, offerings, and relationships. He argues the protocol's compact grammar—three economic primitives (purchase, revenue split, investment) plus composition mechanisms—can represent bespoke institutional arrangements like Haier's Rendanheyi model or joint ventures as 'sentences' in a common organizational language, becoming essential as AI agents enter firms and transaction costs collapse.

company-world-model-for-agentic-coordination composable-organization contract-graph-common-alphabet-of-units-and-offerings

Simone Cicero

Talk

Guest Talk with Daniel Bashir | A Survey of AI for the Protocol-Minded

Daniel Bashir, ML engineer at AWS and host of The Gradient podcast, surveys how protocol thinking applies across AI—from funding and scaling laws (like DeepMind's Chinchilla compute-optimal training protocol) to benchmarks (perplexity vs. François Chollet's ARC benchmark for measuring sample-efficient generalization) to regulation (the EU AI Act's risk-tiered categorization). He argues that nearly every layer of AI development—research, engineering, deployment, and governance—can be reframed as a set of competing or evolving protocols, using examples like Sarah Hooker's 'hardware lottery' and Tolga Bolukbasi-style debates over fair/responsible AI operationalization.

benchmarks-as-protocols-perplexity-arc-vibe-based-evaluation chollets-formal-definition-of-intelligence-and-generalization-hierarchy eu-ai-act-risk-based-regulatory-tiers

Daniel Bashir