Skip to content

Guest Talk with Renee DiResta | A Troll's Guide to the Internet

Talk Renee DiResta

Renee DiResta traces how 'trolling' evolved from a good-natured in-group initiation ritual on early BBS and blog communities into a weaponized tactic used by state actors like Russia, ISIS, Turkey's AKP, and Pakistani and Tanzanian operatives who exploit platform design gaps and policy loopholes (e.g., fake DMCA takedowns, mass-reporting gamification, hacked accounts) before platforms develop corresponding moderation protocols. She argues social platforms are designed for 'best case' use, creating a persistent gap between technological design affordances and reactive content-moderation policy, and discusses the historical collapse of the distinction between 'propaganda machine' (one-to-many broadcast) and 'rumor mill' (peer-to-peer salience-driven spread) in the social media era. She closes by weighing whether decentralized, federated protocols (Mastodon, Bluesky's AT Protocol) can offset this dynamic given they lack the large-scale moderation infrastructure of major platforms.</summary_truncated>

Related resources

Talk

Guest Talk with Bryan Johnson | The Blueprint Protocol

In an interview format with Venkatesh Rao, Bryan Johnson describes his Blueprint Protocol—a self-experimentation regime using extensive biomarker measurement, strict diet (2000 calories, vegan, 11am last meal), supplement 'survival of the fittest' testing, and sleep optimization—to reverse his biological aging. Johnson also discusses his 'evening Brian vs. morning Brian' internal-personas framework for behavioral control, his brain-interface company Kernel's spectroscopy-based brain-age measurement, and his evolving personal philosophy that 'don't die' is the only meaningful species-level objective given emerging AI superintelligence.

blueprint-protocol-self-experimentation-framework closed-loop-biomarker-measurement dont-die-philosophy-ai-alignment-with-human-longevity

Bryan Johnson, Venkatesh Rao

Talk

Guest Talk with Daniel Bashir | A Survey of AI for the Protocol-Minded

Daniel Bashir, ML engineer at AWS and host of The Gradient podcast, surveys how protocol thinking applies across AI—from funding and scaling laws (like DeepMind's Chinchilla compute-optimal training protocol) to benchmarks (perplexity vs. François Chollet's ARC benchmark for measuring sample-efficient generalization) to regulation (the EU AI Act's risk-tiered categorization). He argues that nearly every layer of AI development—research, engineering, deployment, and governance—can be reframed as a set of competing or evolving protocols, using examples like Sarah Hooker's 'hardware lottery' and Tolga Bolukbasi-style debates over fair/responsible AI operationalization.

benchmarks-as-protocols-perplexity-arc-vibe-based-evaluation chollets-formal-definition-of-intelligence-and-generalization-hierarchy eu-ai-act-risk-based-regulatory-tiers

Daniel Bashir

Talk

Guest Talk with Jesse Walden | Contract Theory and Protocol Design

Jesse Walden (Variant VC, co-founder of Media Chain) presents a framework derived from Oliver Hart's contract theory, distinguishing 'complete' protocols (simple, deterministic, trust-minimized, automated — e.g. Bitcoin, Uniswap v1) from 'incomplete' protocols that require ongoing human governance and interpretation (e.g. Aave, Nouns DAO, MolochDAO's rage-quit mechanism). He argues many crypto projects fall into an 'uncanny valley' by claiming completeness/decentralization they don't actually have, and points to Uniswap v4's hooks as a hybrid model that automates a complete core while delegating customization to the market. Discussion with Tim, Angela Walch, and others explores whether true completeness is ever attainable, the role of tokens as 'economic alignment' products, and regulatory incentives (SEC's 'sufficient decentralization') that pressure projects to overclaim completeness.

complete-vs-incomplete-protocols contract-theory-oliver-hart governance

Jesse Walden